A common strategy for identifying molecules likely to possess a desired biological activity is to search large databases of compounds for high structural similarity to a query molecule that demonstrates this activity, under the assumption that structural similarity is predictive of similar biological activity. However, efforts to systematically benchmark the diverse array of available molecular fingerprints and similarity coefficients have been limited by a lack of large-scale datasets that reflect biological similarities of compounds. To elucidate the relative performance of these alternatives, we systematically benchmarked 11 different molecular fingerprint encodings, each combined with 13 different similarity coefficients, using a large set of chemical-genetic interaction data from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a systematic proxy for biological activity. We found that the performance of different molecular fingerprints and similarity coefficients varied substantially and that the all-shortest path fingerprints paired with the Braun-Blanquet similarity coefficient provided superior performance that was robust across several compound collections. We further proposed a machine learning pipeline based on support vector machines that offered a fivefold improvement relative to the best unsupervised approach. Our results generally suggest that using high-dimensional chemical-genetic data as a basis for refining molecular fingerprints can be a powerful approach for improving prediction of biological functions from chemical structures.

• PMID: 34318674
• DOI full text
• PMC full text
• PubMed
• PubTator

Reference Type

Journal Article | Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Authors

Safizadeh H, Simpkins SW, Nelson J, Li SC, Piotrowski JS, Yoshimura M, Yashiroda Y, Hirano H, Osada H, Yoshida M, ... Show all

Primary Lit For

Additional Lit For

Review For